Monday, February 25, 2013
Tuesday, February 19, 2013
MY processes and a man named ... Zinsser
As for my writing process I believe that i have managed to make a steady progression, although my first draft seems to have had lack of any data what so ever, i believe that with the knowledge presented tome by the text i have read gives me some sort of information and i continue to write my paper, building my ideas, adding onto my thoughts. I have been and will continue to write in ernest what i have been so far, i will critisize and understand the current teaching method of the elementary teachers, but i believe that a time for change would be in the interest of anyone and i will write as to why.
My reasearch will rotate around the axis of what the effect of music has upon each person, and i will offer the ideals in which i present and back them with the axis, and i will also observe what todays current teaching is.
After reading this paper, i have seen a new point of view, less is more he says, it makes so much more he says; although my problem is that if i were to follow this approach instead of my usual i believe that all those years of improving my diction in the hopes of making my matter speech more eloquent would be a waste. I believe that if we restricted our speech to the standards written in ths paper would not be benificial but instead make writing a a tad more difficult. I personaly was always told that i am not making the way i talk better, but making the manner in which i speak more eloquent.
My reasearch will rotate around the axis of what the effect of music has upon each person, and i will offer the ideals in which i present and back them with the axis, and i will also observe what todays current teaching is.
After reading this paper, i have seen a new point of view, less is more he says, it makes so much more he says; although my problem is that if i were to follow this approach instead of my usual i believe that all those years of improving my diction in the hopes of making my matter speech more eloquent would be a waste. I believe that if we restricted our speech to the standards written in ths paper would not be benificial but instead make writing a a tad more difficult. I personaly was always told that i am not making the way i talk better, but making the manner in which i speak more eloquent.
Monday, February 4, 2013
Reading The Times... Beliefs and such
The thought that we have gained our own reasoning for the sake of only being right, i can not agree with this. I am not being stubborn, it is an interesting notion, i just think that we developed our reasoning due to the accumulation of knowledge of the race over the years. I don't think reasoning is to help us find better beliefs, better descisions yes but beliefs, no.
I think reasoning could have started back to survival, we learned to make desicions as well as think of ways to get food and water. At the start of our race, we were "Man the hunted" and I see the early people as first using their thoughts on survival, thinking of new tools to help us survive.
This thought of being arguementive, that wouldn't change righting at all, people write as such all the time. Myself personally I write what I see as right and wrong, I am the one who interperates it all, the problems and questions are let in the air (in this case the paper) I have to use my reasoning to first interperate and then cmmunicate what would appear right to me.
To relate myself, to the thought of this article, I can say that yes I did argue only to be right, as well as tell a lie, I find this entire article interesting, it is a different notion that we may hold true, as children, but as we mature we use are reasoning for the first belief
I think reasoning could have started back to survival, we learned to make desicions as well as think of ways to get food and water. At the start of our race, we were "Man the hunted" and I see the early people as first using their thoughts on survival, thinking of new tools to help us survive.
This thought of being arguementive, that wouldn't change righting at all, people write as such all the time. Myself personally I write what I see as right and wrong, I am the one who interperates it all, the problems and questions are let in the air (in this case the paper) I have to use my reasoning to first interperate and then cmmunicate what would appear right to me.
To relate myself, to the thought of this article, I can say that yes I did argue only to be right, as well as tell a lie, I find this entire article interesting, it is a different notion that we may hold true, as children, but as we mature we use are reasoning for the first belief
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)