The thought that we have gained our own reasoning for the sake of only being right, i can not agree with this. I am not being stubborn, it is an interesting notion, i just think that we developed our reasoning due to the accumulation of knowledge of the race over the years. I don't think reasoning is to help us find better beliefs, better descisions yes but beliefs, no.
I think reasoning could have started back to survival, we learned to make desicions as well as think of ways to get food and water. At the start of our race, we were "Man the hunted" and I see the early people as first using their thoughts on survival, thinking of new tools to help us survive.
This thought of being arguementive, that wouldn't change righting at all, people write as such all the time. Myself personally I write what I see as right and wrong, I am the one who interperates it all, the problems and questions are let in the air (in this case the paper) I have to use my reasoning to first interperate and then cmmunicate what would appear right to me.
To relate myself, to the thought of this article, I can say that yes I did argue only to be right, as well as tell a lie, I find this entire article interesting, it is a different notion that we may hold true, as children, but as we mature we use are reasoning for the first belief
No comments:
Post a Comment